No Time to Die (2021) - Where to Watch, Reviews, Trailers, Cast - Watchmode

No Time to Die (2021)

Retired spy's peaceful life shattered by a high-stakes rescue mission; ideal for action-thriller fans, not for a quiet night in.

Genres: Action, Thriller, Adventure

Cast

  • Cast member 1
  • Cast member 2
  • Cast member 3
  • Cast member 4
  • Cast member 5
  • Cast member 6
  • Cast member 7
  • Cast member 8
  • Cast member 9
  • Cast member 10

Your Status

No Time to Die(2021)

PG-13
Movie2h 43mEnglishAction, Thriller, Adventure
7.5
User Score
76%
Critic Score
IMDb

Where to Watch

Overview

Bond has left active service and is enjoying a tranquil life in Jamaica. His peace is short-lived when his old friend Felix Leiter from the CIA turns up asking for help. The mission to rescue a kidnapped scientist turns out to be far more treacherous than expected, leading Bond onto the trail of a mysterious villain armed with dangerous new technology.

My Friends' Ratings

None of your friends have rated this yet.

Featured Comments/Tips

Ana de Armas steals the show and I'm not sure that's a good thing for such a small part

A proper send-off for Daniel Craig, he did much for the franchise. One of the better Bond-films for sure, there'#39;s lots to like here. The acting is great, music fantastic and obviously the action is riveting. Even at 163 minutes, it does not drag - and even though I wanted more, the ending was perfect. It'#39;s exciting to discuss who will become the next Bond, but let'#39;s enjoy this ride first and let it sink in.

Ana de Armas was the best thing in this film. Brought some life into the movie. A good bond movie but far from Daniel Craig's best.

An exciting action film typical of the franchise with 007 saving the world, loved it. I particularly enjoyed the small role of Paloma by Ana de Armas, she sparkled playing that part. In all honesty I could see a Paloma spin off, at least one. We're due for a new action film heroine to arise and I'm not overly enthusiastic about a female Bond. Hope to see Paloma again.

You have all the time in the world :hearts:

When it is a Bond movie, your expectations are at a high level. OK, we know the history but this is nothing more than an ordinary action movie. It is sad to see Bond movies evolving latest years. I remember old ones were full of extreme scenes which can be only done by Bond and full of never-forgotten sayings where they call those into your attention frequently. Everything is becoming lame so these movies are. They should follow the original casting from the book. There should not be a gay Q, female 007, or etc. In general, I am not opposed to any of those but this is the way of a Bond movie. I am disappointed.

A poor send-off for the great Daniel Craig. The action is lacklustre compared to previous outings and resembles a first-person shooter game for much of the time. The love interest is flat and uninspiring, Rami Malek'#39;s villain intones nonsensical, cliched dialogue in a disinterested manner and the whole thing takes far too long to go nowhere. The only bold and interesting choice comes right at the end of the movie but it is too late to redeem this flabby effort.

What a waste of Rami Malek and Christop Waltz…. Story made no sense… This is not a James Bond movie TBH should have had a different name I give it a 4 for the bar scene that was good… the rest better skip and go back to watch some of the classics…

Im kind of sad about the Craig-era ending, but it was a great ride with a good ending. I really like that the whole James Bond-franchise became more action-based and less about goofy henchmen and gadgets. He was the first Bond that could actually kick someones ass. I really doubt that about all the previous ones. Anyway, the action in No Time To Die was awesome, as expected. The fights, chases, etcetera were all good. The music is amazing (I still can'#39;t get enough of the classic Bond tunes). I didn'#39;t really care for the whole '#39;new 007'#39;-bit. But the performances of Craig, Malek and all the others were great. Emotional at times, but mostly bad ass. All in al, they did a good job to tie the whole Craig-saga together and I enjoyed it very much. Worth the wait.

Spoilers

Oh yes ! Such a original idea of killing off main characters

This isn’t a typical bond film. There’s too much introspection and too many cracks in the Bond veneer to qualify as just another Bond flick. Instead, the film is probably an attempt to modernize some of the classic elements of the franchise. Despite this laudable goal, No Time can’t be counted as a success. The story arch is severely underdeveloped and difficult to follow.

No Time to Die, but a lot of time to cry :cry: A beautiful send off to Daniel Craig as Bond.

Spoilers

Watch Spectre before watching this, even if you'#39;ve already seen it. This will prevent you from scratching your head in confusion for the first half of the movie. It'#39;s been 6 years, I completely forgot about the events and characters in Spectre and they are pretty much required knowledge unless you don'#39;t care about the details of who is who and what is what at all. Having said that, No Time to Die was an okay bond movie. It has some of the classic, humorous, near impossible, bond moments from the old bond movies while also having the more serious, emotional, sometimes frustrating, moments we expect to see in the modern ones. [spoiler]As for the ending, all I kept thinking was how this weapon, in it'#39;s dormant state, would'#39;ve been more easy to '#34;cure'#34; than a traditional bioweapon. They keep repeating how it can'#39;t be countered once '#34;infected'#34; but that just seemed like an easy out. Having said that, the choice Bond made still makes sense as it completely eliminated the chance of it ever reaching his family. Besides, he was completely shot up anyway, there was no way this man was walking away from the situation alive.[/spoiler]

Spoilers

Goodbye Mr. Bond. Your death was phenomenal.

I’m so very tired of the EVIL RUSSIAN TROPE. Maybe I’d like modern action movies if the villains weren’t always '#34;Russians who want to destroy America/the world.'#34; No motivation, just being Russian is enough to be evil. Who else than a Russian!? What would Hollywood be if Russia didn’t exist? They would not have a single villain! The whole industry would’ve collapse if they didn’t have the Russians. Get a new plot line, already! Rami Maleks vaguely Russian accent is an insult. Hollywood/Brits are allergic to hiring Russian actors to play ... Russians. Why, while there are tons of Russian-speaking actors in Hollywood/Britain you bring people who barely can pronounce simple phrases or even their names? I couldn'#39;t finish this long car commercial. Bond, as per usual, behaves following the same logic as Bella in the _Twilight Saga_. The film is formulaic and utterly boring.

If you, like me, had some doubts about Daniel Craig’s as a 007, No Time To Die has changed that. The non stop action and suspense thrilled me, proving that the bumped up running time was worth every minute. It has everything you want and expect in a bond film plus more. Just a few characters at M16 were a tad bitchy but tolerable, at least they try keep us safe from the bad guys. Still feeling this could be my favourite bond film.

I wasn’t a big fan of daniel craig as james bond and his movies beforehand were alright but not brilliant but he’s proven me wrong with no time to die thats become my favourite James bond, plot was sound, one liners were fun, action was class and the cast were great but wasn’t a big fan of lashana’s character or even acting and ana de armas should of had more time with her character.

Bond makers take some big swings. That'#39;s all I can say.

There are all the things you expect from a Bond movie here…the one liners, the action, the lovemaking, the global locations…but it’s also a film that surprises, in more ways than one. I’m saying nothing more so as to avoid spoilers, but if you’re a Bond fan (particularly of the Craig era), you will like this. It’s not perfect - it drags around the midsection - but there is still a lot to enjoy.

Wasn’t really impressed by this one... I think I was expecting a bit more from a James Bond movie

Spoilers

A waiting a so long time for ... this. OST is bad, with no emotion. I can belive is an Hans Zimmer composition. The editing of the title '#34;song'#34; is bland, fortunately the song interpreted by Billie Einish raises the level [spoiler]Ian Flemind must be turning over in his grave...[/spoiler] [spoiler]First at the beginning James Bond doesn'#39;t work for MI6 and the 007 number is given to a black woman, then James Bond meets his daughter, James Bond daddy, .... and the best of all the elimination of all the members of SPECTRE.[/spoiler] [spoiler]And the worst thing is the end 'gt; James Bond is simply killed. I find this very irrespectful against Daniel Craig who has always invested himself in the interpretation of 007. He has even been physically injured on the set several times. Certainly he will return with a new interpreter? At the point where we are why not an obese 18 years, in a wheelchair, with piercings and vegan.[/spoiler]

PremiĆØre expected Oct 2021. Probably cinema release?

How on earth have 18k people managed to watch this? hahaha

Featured User Reviews

What a sequence of BS. I mean Bond plots were always crazy and I am very generous when it comes to plot holes (trust me there are a lot) but what exactly is this guy's motivation? Is it because his face is scarred? Why was he hunting Spectre and Blofeld (forgive my ignorance but is that because Mr. White worked with Spectre - how the hell am I supposed to know with whom a minor character in one of the previous movies was affiliated?) Why wanted he Felix and Bond dead? And why did he take Mathilde and Madeleine hostage? How are they or Bond important to him in the grand scheme of things? What illicit or legal operations financed his massive clandestine operation? Or is that some sort of Zen inspired cloister with WMDs? Plus, why was there need for an urgent bombardment? I don't understand the rush. It's not as if the poison was about to be launched in intercontinental rockets any moment (and the other agencies will probably find out about MI6's secret weapon anyway). Plus, if that's poison, would you bomb that island and disperse any liquid? What could probably go wrong? This movie is about 2 hours too long, cause the writers had an overlong checklist: visit at least 4 continents and 6 exotic locations (Italy and the bomb shelter are actually marvelous) in a rapid sequence, show 2 wonderful women (and who wouldn't find dangerous Paloma gorgeous - best 10 minutes of the movie), have 100 stunts, have two kinds of DNA based/ DNA activated WMDs, 20 fist fights in tight spots, 80 Landrovers and every other possible vehicle that is imaginable, and bring all lose ends from previous movies to an end (the bromance with Felix, Vesper, Blofeld, Spectre, Bond and whatnot). It's a mediocre movie at best. There's not a single iconic moment that will be remembered. It's just explosions. Even Bond's death is inconsequential. There will be another Bond.

Bloody Hell!!!!!! What a send-off to Daniel Craig's Bond. Literally, one of the best films I have seen this year and I have to say one of my favourite Bond films, the action was beautiful and the story had me on the edge of my seat which the previous outing did not do for me. I have to say the reason I think this film is so great is it is the most unique out of all of the Daniel Craig films with pretty perfect directing from Cary Joji Fukunaga and also using the older films prior to Daniel Graig being used to inspiring the films action, humour and just characters in general. Also, I have to say the acting was great in this film as Daniel Craig (James Bond) is one of the best and he brings emotion to the character that no other Bond has, Lea Seydoux (Madeleine Swann) was used much better in this film and I believed her fear/love, Lashana Lynch (Nomi / 007) was a pleasant surprise as I am not a fan of hers but she had such great chemistry with Daniel Craig and sad we won't see them together. The biggest surprises were Christoph Waltz (Blofeld) who was a nothing villain in the previous film but in this, he just felt so much better even though he didn't have much screen time and Ana De Armas (Paloma) who really stole the show in her one scene and she literally me in stitches but also was freaking badass. Thank you Daniel Craig for giving us such a great outing but also thank you to everyone involved who made sure this film does not only do justice to the character but also the franchise, I think old fans and new fans are going to love this film. Please see it in the cinema as it was a beautiful cinema experience.

Spoilers

It’s funny to know that this movie was intended to come out before the pandemic, because by releasing it now it might provide some unintentional food for thought for the morons who believe that a certain virus was actually conceived in a lab. I genuinely wonder if those people will read that far into this film, I’d find it deeply amusing. The good news is that there are definetely a lot of things this does better than _Spectre_. The action is memorable and way more visceral (though it doesn’t quite surpass the _Mission Impossible Fallout_ bar) and the characters are generally more interesting. I loved the women in this in particular, they all have distinct personalities and they’re not flawless human beings or overpowered (e.g. Ana de Armas is bubbly and fun, but at the same time she’s inexperienced and chaotic), like some blockbusters tend to do. At the same time, we shouldn’t pretend that this film invented strong female characters for Bond, especially after we’ve had Eva Green and Judi Dench. Meanwhile, James Bond himself has a very satisfying arc in this film, which isn’t too dissimilar to [spoiler] Tony Stark’s arc in Avengers Endgame [/spoiler], with a bold pay off in the third act. I’m happy that this film gave us confirmation that Mads Mikkelsen [spoiler] didn’t end up castrating Bond [/spoiler] in _Casino Royale_. It’s paced very well, more like a traditional action film and less like a drama, which was the case for _Skyfall_ and _Spectre_. And finally, the whole thing just looks great, it’s produced exuisetely. The cinematography isn’t quite _Skyfall_ level, but Roger Deakins is an impossible bar to clear for any cinematographer. Unfortunately, this film really struggles with its tone, bouncing wildly between cartoonish nonsense and very dark, dramatic moments. The plot is extremely silly and there are many cartoony moments, but it also has some scenes that feel more in line with the grit of _Casino Royale_. It wants to honor the traditional Bond stuff, but at the same time it can’t let go of the roots of the Daniel Craig iteration, which makes it feel like an uneven artistic vision, because the foundation of Craig’s Bond rests on this idea that this isn’t the traditional Bond. Also, Rami Malek didn’t leave much of an impression on me, kinda feeling like a stock villain (very much like Waltz in the last film). There’s not really an interesting motivation there, or an interesting evil plan. It’s a campy and theatrical plan, and it feels very familiar. Finally, this film can be fairly predictable at times (for example: [spoiler] Matilde being Bond’s daughter was extremely obvious, they never should’ve played that as a twist. The same goes for Lea Seydoux being framed [/spoiler]). So, it’s good, it pushes the creative boundaries of what a Bond movie is in some ways, which is the best stuff. But I kinda hope they bring in someone with a fresh, fully realized artistic vision for the next reboot. 7/10 Ps for the Bond producers: please, please make a spin off with Ana de Armas’ character.

Damsel in distress. Except that's what makes this film stand out as different from other Bond movies. It isn't a damsel in distress, but instead a child in jeopardy. 007 finds himself trying to protect the most innocent of creatures. Along the way, he goes through some high octane action sequences. And he fights against a villain using genetic engineering in a weird and deadly way. However, the biggest problems here are "predictability" and "horrible directing". The imagery is horrible. Even when there are exotic locales, there is not one cinematic second. It's all dull and tedious. The classic 007 films of the Connery and Moore era had cinematic beauty with exotic locales. In the era of Daniel Craig, this poor actor has to go through movies where the director can't even make imagery out of the most exotic locations. Why even film on locations? This may as well been done in the studio of Mr. Rogers and his neighborhood.

I guess there was time to die, and as so many predicted, be replaced with a female Bond of color. Because... woke. But it is fitting that Craig went out like that, he seemed to be the only man in the world that didn't want to be James Bond. There was nothing playful about him... ... he was just miserable, and miserable from start to finish. I don't see the draw in watching a depressing 007, and I don't see the draw in watching the inevitable new Politically Correct 007 either. Neither seem to fit with the franchise.

VideosYouTube

Leave a Comment/Tip

140 characters remaining

Write a Review

10000 characters remaining

Set Alert

We'll notify you when No Time to Die becomes available on:

Report an Issue

What's wrong with this page?

Create New List

0/125 characters (minimum 5)

Examples:

  • Sci-Fi Classics
  • Date Night Movies
  • Shows to Watch with Kids
  • Award Winners

No Time to Die Poster

100%
No Time to Die Poster

Available in 6 Countries

Loading

...