Mindless action, not much of a story. In my opinion Norton does a great job in the chasing scenes, and the Hulk action scenes look great (although they are too much and too long), but they don't really fit together in the same movie. I guess Hulk is great as a side character, but too difficult a character and story to fill a 90 minute movie with.
Conclusion: worst movie in the 'Avengers' series, and I won't be watching again.

Great motion picture representation of the Hulk as I always knew him. Spectacular, well done.

Nothing special

Really wish norton would have stayed on to play hulk throughout the other movies. He’s a way better banner than Ruffalo

The Incredible Hulk tries to be a more mature take on the famous superhero, but it honestly just felt like an incredibly dated, poorly casted and one-dimensional movie. Edward Norton is the least convincing Bruce Banner ever and had zero chemistry with Liv Tyler. The plot itself offers no growth for the characters nor reasons to actually care about any of them. It's just a bunch of lousy CGI action scenes watered down by dull and uninteresting narrative sequences. Tim Roth's character started as mildly interesting but ended up being a Power Rangers movie villain. It could have been successful if it was released in the '90s maybe.

Don't forget to watch Ang Lee's 2003 film before you see (or rewatch) this one: it's a way better film, for which The Incredible Hulk serves as a sort of retconned unofficial sequel. (But beware: it's not your usual superhero flick.)

Film 133 (Goal: 300) of 2024:

Better than I remembered, but not by much. Liv Tyler is still terrible, and I never liked Roth's performance. Tim Blake Nelson's almost steals the show in a brief role. Overall okay, but ultimately forgettable.

"The Incredible Hulk" is an enjoyable movie with an exciting climax and final battle. The film effectively tells the back story of the Hulk through the opening credits, the look and style of which were fantastic. Although I know it wouldn't be commercially successful, I would have loved to see this stylized setup stretched into something more.

The movie drags a bit until Hulk battles the military in a campus park. The effects are impressive and the action moves pretty quick. General Ross, played by William Hurt, is driven and ruthless in his pursuit of Banner. He takes it one step too far when he recruits the battle crazy Major Blonsky, played with expected intensity by Tim Roth. Blonsky is transformed into a super-soldier to challenge the Hulk and truthfully, the whole thing is rather predictable after that. It's a good superhero action movie but it's not of the same caliber as "The Dark Knight", "Spiderman 2", or "Iron Man".

The stinker of phase 1, shame cause it had 2 great leads

I'm not here for acting or plot... I'm here (again) for HULK SMASH!!!!

If you're a fan of the comics, or just of fun popcorn films you'll definitely enjoy this one.

This movie is destined to fail no matter what lead actor they choose.

In the end, Hulk has its own face, he's pretty much speechless and also quite inexpressive in terms of acting.

i watched it right the day after i watched the avengers.
but also in comparision with the partly trashy 2003-hulk, edward norton don't really fits in.

It was a good decision to change the banner char. Norton was fantastic in primal fear and also in fight club. But now he just don't gives me a good hulk.

In the end 5/10

Much better movie than the original **Hulk**.

Nice job by _Edward Norton_. I love _Liv Tyler_. I didn't like _Tim Roth_ at all as the bad guy. I just did not see him at all in the role of an elite soldier: too old, too weak looking. Sorry _Tim_.