The Hunger

Movie

1983

1h 36m

English

Horror, Drama

User Score:

6.7

Critic Score:

Rent From $3.49

Five-thousand-year-old vampire Miriam promises her lovers the gift of eternal life. When John, her cellist companion for centuries, discovers that he has suddenly begun growing old, he attempts to seek out the help of Dr. Sarah Roberts, a researcher on the mechanisms of agin...

Play Trailer

The Hunger

Movie

1983

1h 36m

English

Horror, Drama

Play Trailer

Rent From $3.49

WATCHMODE

6.7

IMDB

CRITIC SCORE

Where to watch

Rent

$3.99SD

$3.99HD

Buy

$9.99SD

$6.99SD

$9.99HD

Available in 4 other countries.

Filter sources:

See something wrong? Let us know

My Friends' Ratings

In order to see what your friends rated The Hunger, you need a Watchmode account. It's free and takes just a minute. Create an account

Cast

Miriam Blaylock

John Blaylock

Sarah Roberts

Tom Haver

Alice Cavender

Lieutenant Allegrezza

Charlie Humphries

Phyllis

Ron

Young Woman from Disco

John Stephen Hill

Young Man from Disco

Shane Rimmer

Arthur Jelinek

Peter Murphy

Performer in Club (uncredited)

Douglas Lambert

TV Host

Bessie Love

Lillybelle

John Pankow

1st Phone Booth Youth

Willem Dafoe

2nd Phone Booth Youth

Girl in London House

Boy in London House

Waiting Room Nurse

1st Intern

2nd Intern

Skater

Eumenes

Egyptian Slave

Directed By: Tony Scott

Written By: Michael Thomas (Screenplay), James Costigan (Screenplay), + 1 more

Featured Comments/Tips

jjjjs says...

3 months ago

Somewhere behind the screen of noisy Manhattan of the 80s, bloodsuckers spend their melancholic leisure time in mansions, however, not really hiding from people. Whom they of course use like cattle, but in an impeccable decadent-sensual style. Ah, they also thirst for love, but there is only hunger! Beautiful, but boring

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

johnaccardo says...

one year ago

This kinda felt like two different movies in two parts. And I thought the first movie was super interesting and really unconventional. And then the first movie is over very quickly and the second movie isn't quite as interesting and quite a bit more conventional. If they combined the two different arcs into something that overlapped more I may have found it a bit more satisfying. But this is still very unique all around!

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

davysgrey says...

5 years ago

Creeped me out pretty bad toward the end so good enough in that area, but overall it felt pretty messy and I probably won't come back to it. If you're only watching it for David Bowie (like I did), it's probably worth it.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

moonkodi says...

8 years ago

Lot's of style thrown in your face but not much else.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

Show all comments (6) Leave comment

Featured User Reviews

Bronson87

5/10 2 years ago

So, this is barely a horror movie, and hardly a vampire movie. The first hour is a very slow build, and the end kicks into horror all at once. If I were a fan of style over substance, I'd love this - the lighting is amazing, and the camera work is fabulous - trouble is I'm not and I didn't. I was ju More

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

talisencrw

6 years ago

I have to admit that although I've had the DVD forever, simply based on the laurels of the beauty/acting accomplishments of David Bowie and Catherine Deneuve, and that nothing I had ever watched by Tony Scott, with the exception of 'Crimson Tide', really gripped me as being cinephilically exceptiona More

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

Show all reviews (2) Write Review