Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: The Batman

Jordyep
CONTAINS SPOILERS7/10  3 years ago
This is in many ways the exact movie that _The Lego Batman Movie_ made fun of.
So, I can totally understand if this film reads like self-parody to some (I'll admit, the gravely film noir detective voice over was a bit much, it's been parodied to death at this point), but I'd argue that it's overall a refreshing take on the character in a well thought out story that includes some excellent performances. Paul Dano, Robert Pattinson and Zoe Kravitz all nail their roles.
It's a typical Matt Reeves blockbuster in every sense. It's grounded, serious, and there's a strong emphasis on drama/tension, and less on action. The production and style of this thing are phenomenal. Excellent cinematography, which should be Oscar nominated (but won't), music, production value, costumes, directing, etcetera. It's grim, it's dark, it's gritty, but it doesn't feel like it's directed by a 16 year old edgelord either. I love how the colour palette of this film is restricted to black, grey, orange and red. It's perfect, taking clear influences from David Fincher films, neo noir detectives and '70s paranoia thrillers (and maybe a hint of Marvel Netflix as well). I hope it reinvents the wheel for many blockbusters to come.
Its biggest problem are the pacing and the characters. I'm fine with defending longer films, but this isn't a smooth 3 hour ride like _The Wolf of Wallstreet_. It holds its cards very close to the chest during the first half, to the point where it's hard to engage with and can get kinda boring. It's a lot of set-up, mood and atmosphere, and not much else. It doesn't really hook you with its characters or the dramatic intrigue of the story. I didn't find this slow moving mystery compelling enough by itself (partially because it doesn't really engage the audience; you can't solve it by yourself), and there's not even that much action to compensate, besides a few quick beats here and there.
It also relies too much on the cultural iconography of Batman and Catwoman that already exists in our current zeitgeist, and while I might know those characters as cultural icons, I don't know **this** Batman, or **this** Catwoman. It eventually gets there though, as The Riddler and Catwoman get a lot more interesting in their own right as the film goes along, but it takes a long time. I love that this Riddler is essentially re-imagined to be a [spoiler] radicalized 4 Chan incel [/spoiler], which feels very relevant for today. Still, we know very little about Batman by the end of it (besides his brooding indie rockstar behavior), which is mostly due to the general lack of Bruce Wayne in the film. Batman cannot be interesting without a good Bruce Wayne accompanying him. That's nothing against Robert Pattinson, he's very good in it, but his Batman is written in a very one note way. As a film, it would've benefitted a lot from a deeper dive into his psyche, because the emotional arc of his character doesn't feel earned by the end of the film.
Still, these issues could easily be fixed in a sequel, it's a good enough foundation for a series of great Batman films.

7/10
Like  -  Dislike  -  52
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by kvshr
3 years ago
@jordyep exactly, and for me the good points couldn’t make up the bad points (pacing and the characters!). First half was borderline boring and not even trying to engange the viewers.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Erebos
3 years ago
@jordyep I felt that the film could've benefited a lot from some non-linear storytelling, [spoiler]beginning _in medias res_ either with the Riddler already in custody and Batman interrogating him or with Batman captured by the Riddler (ala M:I-3).[/spoiler]
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top