Firstly I would like to point out some things because there are some _edgy teen_ and _anti-religious_ comments here that are missing the point of a **FICTIONAL** narrative, this is **FICTIONAL**, not a documentary.

Despite your political, religious, or non-religious (I'm an atheist) views of the world, you must see a piece of art for what it is, a piece of art, nothing less, nothing more. You can hate it, you can love it, but judge by the same standards you would rate a movie that fits your view of world. This movie is not a documentary, it's a fictional work, It is not supposed to be seen only as a political thing, you must analyze it for everything that a piece of cinematographic art is: photography; acting; music; plot; and so on — said that I will try to resume what I think about the movie:

I was not expecting this kind of acting. Sean Patrick has nailed the character here, his job here was spectacular. I liked Jordan Belfi acting as well but what really stands out here is Nefarious character. The plot is pretty solid, the dialogue between Dr. James and Nefarious makes you really immersive in the movie. This is the kind of movie that NEEDS good acting and plot to make the spectator watch it since there is almost nothing more than this. There is nothing special about the image like angles, luminosity, or photography, is not bad, but nothing here stands out. Yet music... I really missed this part. That's something that I particularly think you CAN'T underestimate, a good soundtrack will build everything in the movie, and it will make even a bad scenario and bad photography stand out. Here in Nefarious the soundtrack is missing for a lot of the time, and some parts with no soundtrack at all (this is really bad for the movie), yet the SFX are there, not the best ones, but they are okay. The only thing I really didn't like about the plot was the final scene [spoiler] Nefarious just showing up like this was really some bad choice for ending the plot, no tension building, just "here I am :clown:"[/spoiler].