Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Attila

Zoran81
CONTAINS SPOILERS1/10  2 months ago
Review: Attila the Hun (2001)

I find historical revisionism very difficult to tolerate. Even though this is a dramatization, historical films should maintain some degree of historical authenticity and accuracy. Unfortunately, Attila the Hun fails completely in this regard.

The film is filled with factual errors and rewritten history, making it impossible to take seriously. Here are some of the most significant inaccuracies:
1. Attila’s relationship with the Romans – The film portrays Attila as a close friend and almost an ally of the Roman general Flavius Aetius. In reality, their relationship was far more complicated and driven by diplomacy, not personal friendship.
2. Attila’s personality and background – The film makes him a philosophical “anti-hero,” while historical accounts describe him as a pragmatic and ruthless ruler.
3. The Huns’ culture and clothing – They are shown wearing outfits resembling Nordic or medieval attire, which is completely inaccurate. The Huns had a nomadic culture influenced by Central Asia.
4. The Battle of Chalons (AD 451) – It is depicted as a Roman victory, while in reality, it was more of a stalemate, with Attila retreating rather than being decisively defeated.
5. Attila’s death – The film suggests he was killed in a conspiracy, but historically, he likely died of an internal hemorrhage or suffocation after his wedding.

The film was originally based on a two-part miniseries for American TV, but the mistake of compressing it into a single film likely explains the narrative flaws and omission of important events.

The story is often overly simplified, painting events in black and white while ignoring the complex processes behind Attila’s life and the historical context. This not only diminishes its authenticity but makes the film frustrating to watch.

Ratings:
• Story: 5/10
• Authenticity: 0/10
• Acting: Completely undermined by the historical inaccuracies.
• Production: 5/10

Summary:
Attila the Hun is a turkey of epic proportions. With its total lack of historical accuracy, questionable production, and oversimplified narrative, it earns its place firmly on the “Wall of Shame” of historical films. I give it no more than 1/10.
Like  -  Dislike  -  00
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top