Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: A Star Is Born

nextstep
6/10  a month ago
In the 1954 version of *A Star is Born*, starring Judy Garland and James Mason, the film's photos and stills have a unique story tied to the movie's production and subsequent restoration.

### Key Issues with the Film
**Original Cuts and Studio Interference**:
- The film originally premiered at a length of 182 minutes but was significantly cut down to 154 minutes by Warner Bros. after its initial release. This was done to make the film more commercially viable, but it resulted in the loss of important scenes.
- Many of the cut scenes were either destroyed or lost, as was common at the time when studios didn't prioritize preserving unused footage.

**Restoration Efforts**:
- In the 1980s, film historian Ronald Haver led an ambitious restoration project to bring *A Star is Born* closer to its original version. However, not all the lost footage could be recovered.
- The restoration team managed to recover the audio tracks for some of the missing scenes but not the actual video.

**Photos as a Visual Substitute**:
- To address this gap, Haver used production stills (high-quality photos taken during filming) to accompany the recovered audio. These stills were carefully arranged to approximate the feel of the missing scenes.
- This method allowed audiences to experience the full story, even if the visuals for certain moments were lost.

### Why It’s Significant
- The use of still photos in the restored version of *A Star is Born* was innovative at the time. It demonstrated how archival materials could help reconstruct and preserve film history.
- The photos, combined with Judy Garland’s powerful performance (even in just audio), evoke strong emotions, maintaining the integrity and impact of the original story.

This restoration highlights the challenges and triumphs of preserving cinematic history, especially for films created in an era with fewer resources for long-term archival preservation.
Like  -  Dislike  -  02
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by nextstep
a month ago
Hey, random internet person...yes, you! The 1954 movie might have decent ratings, but it’s just a remake of the brilliant 1937 original, a timeless 9/10 classic. Skip the mess and go straight to the 1937 masterpiece! The Lady Gaga version is solid too...definitely worth a watch.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by nextstep
a month ago
@nextstep Alright, I asked an Chat AI about the remakes of A Star is Born and how they connect. The answer is below. 'Core story' my foot...the 1954 version is just a lousy remake devoid of any originality and charm. I'm not a fan of remakes. Sometimes they work, but more often than not, they don't...and in this case (1954), it's a shitfeast.<br /> <br /> It's pretty disheartening when a film from 1937 FEELS more modern than one from 1954.<br /> <br /> ---<br /> <br /> 9/10 my rating<br /> 1. **1937 version**: The original movie, starring Janet Gaynor and Fredric March, is a romantic drama about a young actress who rises to stardom with the help of an older, fading actor.<br /> <br /> 6/10 my rating<br /> 2. **1954 version**: A musical remake starring Judy Garland and James Mason. It retains the same core story but adds musical elements.<br /> <br /> ?/10 my rating<br /> 3. **1976 version**: Starring Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson, this version shifts the focus to the music industry, with the male lead being a rock star instead of a fading actor. It modernizes the story and adds a more contemporary music-driven twist.<br /> <br /> 8/10 my rating<br /> 4. **2018 version**: Directed by Bradley Cooper and starring Lady Gaga and Cooper himself, this version also focuses on the music industry but updates the themes for a modern audience. While it has similarities to the 1976 version in its setting within the music world, it is not a direct remake of that version but rather an independent reimagining of the original story.<br /> <br /> In essence, all four films share the same basic premise but adapt it to fit the era and medium they are portraying.<br /> <br /> ---
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top